USPTO serial 74276495
STEPMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEPMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Lundy
DAVID A LUNDY LUNDY AND ASSOCIATES1020 ANTHONY WAYNE BLDGFT WAYNE, IN 46802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | exercise mats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |