USPTO serial 74276553
MARINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
La Victoria, Edo. Aragua, VE
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYP O BOX 60309PALO ALTO, CA 94306-0309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | macaroni, spaghetti and pasta of all types | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |