USPTO serial 74276554
DON CAMILO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DON CAMILO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
La Victoria, Edo. Aragua, VE
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
La Victoria, Edo. Aragua, VE
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAS ALIMENTICIAS ALIANZA, C.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE660 HANSEN WAYP O BOX 60309PALO ALTO, CA 94306-0309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | macaroni, spaghetti and pasta of all types | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |