Drawing for SUPER SACKS

USPTO serial 74276842

SUPER SACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER SACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting food operations of others; namely, school lunch programs, food services, fast foods and restaurants with artistic messages of good nutrition and education attractive to and for childrenABANDONEDJul 14, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 29, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 29, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 18, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 24, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 25, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 5, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 31, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance