Drawing for INDEX

USPTO serial 74277255

INDEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen E. Brennan

KATHLEEN E BRENNAN WILLIAN BRINKS OLDS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028sporting goods; namely, tennis rackets, tennis balls, tennis racket covers, badminton rackets, badminton racket covers, badminton shuttlecocks, racquetball rackets, racquetball racket covers, racquetball balls, squash rackets, squash racket covers, squash balls, golf clubs, golf club covers, golf balls, golf club bags, golf club bag tags and golf teesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 1995EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 18, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 22, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 28, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance