USPTO serial 74279270
EASY RIDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY RIDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20148 Milan, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fernanda M. Fiordalisi
FERNANDA M FIORDALISI BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RD GARDEN CITYLONG ISLAND, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, cologne, cosmetics; namely, eye liners, eye shadows, foundation lotions, nail polish, rouge, blush, cleansing milks, mascara, hair dyes, hair lotions, hair gel; skin care cosmetics; namely, bath gels, salts and oils, depilatory creams, tanning creams, shaving creams, soaps, anti perspirant foot soaps; deodorants for personal use; toothpastes and dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |