USPTO serial 74280249
GLOBALFAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBALFAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOCA RATON, FL
Global Village Communication, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
Other trademarks owned by Global Village Communication, Inc.
Global Village Communication, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA
Other trademarks owned by Global Village Communication, Inc.
BOCA RATON, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Carlson
ROBERT J CARLSON CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON ET AL1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunication products, namely, computer modems with fax capabilities | ABANDONED | Apr 20, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOCA GLOBAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Village Communication, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Village Communication, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOCA RESEARCH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GLOBALFAX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |