USPTO serial 74280728
PRIMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
D-6507 Ingelheim am Rhein, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
D-6507 Ingelheim am Rhein, DE
Other trademarks owned by Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Beran
MARTIN J BERAN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | veterinary preparations; namely, antibiotics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1993 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |