USPTO serial 74281307
NBN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NBN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Hughes
NOTHING BUT NET, INC136 BELCREST DRLOS GATOS, CA 95032UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, T-shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, socks, wristbands and overcoats, exclusive of any clothing that is primarily directed to board sports | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |