USPTO serial 74281655
SAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 28, 1996
- Examiner
- COHEN, JEFFREY R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North, St. Petersburg, FL
North, St. Petersburg, FL
North, St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stefan V. Stein
STEFAN V STEIN DOMINIK, STEIN, SACCOCIO, COLITZ& VAN DER WALL3030 N ROCKY POINT DR W STE 400TAMPA, FL 33607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | single and multi-port secure communication systems comprising of electronic user identification cards, controller modules for installation into a computer, interfaces for interfacing the user identification cards to the controller modules, computer programs for secure intercomputer communications and instructional manuals sold therewith, computers, and secure terminals for interfacing computers and modems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 28, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |