USPTO serial 74283022
EFIEXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EFIEXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Hicks
SUSAN L HELLER LOEB & LOEB LLPSTE 220010100 SANTA MONICA BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications in the field of information for users of color imaging, publishing and printing products; namely, newsletters and brochures | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | information services for users of color imaging, publishing and printing products; namely, on-line computer information services, on-line discussion forums on public and private-access information services, technical consultation services, all in the field of color imaging, publishing and printing products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |