USPTO serial 74283194
OLIVER CONRAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2130805Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 1998
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLIVER CONRAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
4000 Dusseldorf 1, DE
4000 Dusseldorf 1, DE
4000 Dusseldorf 1, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
Anthony V. Lupo ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, hats and clothing; namely, shirts, T-shirts, tank tops, undershirts, sweatshirts, swimwear, belts, ponchos, suits, pants, shorts, socks, gloves, ties, scarves, ascots, capes, coats, muffs, track suits, underwear, jackets, jerseys, robes, jeans, gloves, mittens, dressing gowns, raincoats, breeches, pajamas, nightshirts, suspenders, costumes, sweaters, pullovers | EXPIRED | Aug 20, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Jul 30, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 30, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |