USPTO serial 74283351
SUPERLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOROTHY HARRIS
DOROTHY HARRIS LOCKE PURNELL RAIN HARRELL2200 ROSS AVESTE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | concrete | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |