USPTO serial 74283527
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
NEUMARKT/OPF., DE
NEUMARKT, DE
8500 Nurnberg, DE
NEUMARKT/OPF., DE
NEUMARKT/OPF., DE
8500 Nurnberg, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Flavia Campbell
Flavia Campbell DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400Phoenix, AZ 85004United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and electronic apparatus and devices; namely, the following; protection equipment for power supply systems and equipment; namely, lightening arresters, overvoltage arresters, overvoltage protectors, suppression filters, protectors; protection equipment for information technology systems and equipment, and for telecommunication, control, instrumentation and data processing systems; namely, split overvoltage fine protectors, overvoltage fine protector terminals, overvoltage protection plugs and blocks, overvoltage protection cards, overvoltage fine protectors, overvoltage coarse protectors, overvoltage fine protection cards, overvoltage protection adapters, overvoltage protectors, overvoltage coarse protectors, overvoltage fine protection minimodules; spark gaps and components for lightening protection equipotential bonding; namely, spark gaps, equipotenial bonding bars and wires, clamps, fasteners, connectors for foundation earth electrodes; and totally insulated connection boxes for televison satellite transmitters with overvoltage protection input circuit capable of withstanding lightening currents; and overvoltage protection device for use in computer-controlled golf course sprinkler systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |