USPTO serial 74283804
COASTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 1996
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COASTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Secaucus, NJ
Simi Valley, CA
Simi Valley, CA
Simi Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's casual wear and sportswear, namely shoes, swimming suits, shirts, tank tops, T-shirts, blouses, sweatshirts, sweaters, dresses, skirts, shorts, sweatshorts, jeans, pants, slacks, sweatpants, coats; and men's and boys' casual wear and sportswear, namely shoes, shirts, swimming trunks, tank tops, knit shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, sweatshorts, jeans, pants, slacks, sweatpants, and coats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 16, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ILIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUGLE BOY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUGLE BOY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BUGLE BOY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named COASTLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 2, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |