Drawing for CANTERA

USPTO serial 74285101

CANTERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANTERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Blankenbaker

ROBERT E BLANKENBAKER AMOCO CORPORATION200 E RANDOLPH DRMAIL CODE 1905CHICAGO, IL 60601-7125

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036real estate management servicesABANDONEDMay 8, 1992
037real estate development servicesABANDONEDMay 8, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 1995ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 19, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 29, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 2, 1993LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Feb 26, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance