USPTO serial 74285206
FORTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FORTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, WC1V 6TT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan E. J. Branigan
ALAN E J BRANIGAN MILLEN, WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1201ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing facilities for business meetings and conferences; theatrical booking agencies; and business management and consultation services | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | recreational camps; sport camps; arranging or providing facilities for sports tournaments for tennis and golf; rental of motion pictures and videotapes; rental of radios and television sets; gymnasiums; entertainment in the nature of shows; recreational services in the nature of swimming pools, waterslides, tennis courts, exercise facilities, golf courses, skiing, saunas, jacuzzis and whirlpools; providing facilities for exhibitions; arranging and conducting educational meetings and conferences; training of hotel staff and sales representatives in the field of hotel services and management; and arranging or providing instruction in the field of tennis, golf, swimming, skiing, and physical fitness | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant, bar and catering services; canteens; cafes and cafeterias; hotel services; hotel management for others; making hotel reservations for others; architectural, engineering and/or custom design in the field of hotels; house-keeping services; vending in the field of food and beverages; beauty salons; hairdressing services; portrait photography; language translation; and providing campground facilities | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |