USPTO serial 74285305
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank D. Gilliam
FRANK D GILLIAMSTE 1044565 RUFFNER STSAN DIEGO, CA 92111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | components for exhaust systems; namely, mufflers, secondary pipes, tail pipes and exhaust pipe tips | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |