USPTO serial 74286871
BETTER BATTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 1993
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BETTER BATTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sparks, MD
Sparks, MD
WILMINGTON, DE
MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
SPARKS, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN
JORDAN S. WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND ET AL1940 DUKE ST.ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | all purpose seasoned batter mix for use as a coating on fish, seafood, vegetables and other foods prior to frying | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 13, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McCormick & Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by McCormick & Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MCCORMICK DELAWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MCCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BETTER BATTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 4, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |