Drawing for BEN'S

USPTO serial 74287441

BEN'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, DARREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEN'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold L. Novick

HAROLD L NOVICK LARSON AND TAYLOR727 - 23RD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029kosher meats and processed foods; namely, chopped liver; cooked, stuffed cabbage; cooked meats; luncheon meats; potato pancakes; salads; namely, chicken salad, cole slaw, egg salad, health salad consisting primarily of cabbage, potato salad, salmon salad, sauerkraut, tuna salad and vegetable salad; soups and stuffed dermaABANDONEDOct 1, 1972
030kosher staple foods; namely, gravies; pasta salad; and sandwichesABANDONEDOct 1, 1972
042kosher catering services; kosher delicatessen services; and kosher restaurant servicesABANDONEDOct 1, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 8, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 8, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 4, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 27, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance