USPTO serial 74287682
GOURMET GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOURMET GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
OLIVE BRANCH, MS
Santa Monica, CA
POWAY, CA
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell H. Walker
Russell H. Walker Walker, McKenzie & Walker, P.C.P.O. Box 475Memphis, TN 38101-0475UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, pants, shirts, hats, aprons, jackets, leggings and socks | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chefwear
- Other trademarks owned by LANDAU UNIFORMS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Chefwear
- Other trademarks owned by SUNRIPE ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Chefwear
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GOURMET GEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 29, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |