USPTO serial 74287703
STARSCAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARSCAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino
ALEXANDER TOGNINO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW DEPT500 COLUMBUS AVETHORNWOOD, NY 10594Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and communications hardware, CD-ROMS, computer programs, and related instructional manuals sold as a unit, for use in the field of multimedia | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | instruction manuals pertaining to multimedia network-related goods and services, computer and communications hardware, CD-ROMS, and computer programs; printed educational materials in the field of multimedia | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | video game programs | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | multimedia communications services; namely, the electronic transmission of audio, graphical, video, and textual data | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of multimedia communications and distributing course materials therewith; and entertainment services; namely, conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of video games | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | multimedia communications consulting services to facilitate the production, selection, use, and delivery of multimedia computer programming | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named STARSCAPE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |