Drawing for SHOWERSPLASH

USPTO serial 74287819

SHOWERSPLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRUN, JEAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOWERSPLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. E. Frankel

E E FRANKEL46 S MAIN STCONCORD, NH 03301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003bar soapABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 24, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance