USPTO serial 74288190
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jannifer Ju
3925 N ROSEMEAD BLVD #201ROSEMEAD, CA 91770UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | biochemical additives for use in manufactures of pharmaceuticals, fertilizer, food, waste control; bacteria for use in food manufacture; organic fertilizers for agricultural use | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | drink mix for use as meal replacement and dietary supplement | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | fluorescent lighting tubes; water purifying unit for potable water (for domestic use); air purifying units (for domestic use); material for solar collectors and solar heating panels | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | food beverages (vegetable based); protein for use as a meat substitute, protein for use as meal substitutes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |