USPTO serial 74288551
RITE-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RITE-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Weingram
EDWARD R WEINGRAM WEINGRAM & ZALL197 W SPRING VALLEY RDP O BOX 927MAYWOOD, NJ 07607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaning products for household use; namely, laundry detergent, fabric softener, dish detergent and glass cleaner | ABANDONED | May 29, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |