USPTO serial 74289075
ECHELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECHELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin, Esq.
MITCHELL E RADIN ESQ PIPER & MARBURY LLP53 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and shower gel; organic body scrub; body lotion; cleansing lotion; cleansing cream; cleansing gel; face astringent; face freshener; conditioning creme; eye cream; throat cream; hair shampoo; hair rinse; hair conditioner; hand lotion; hair spray; liquid make-up; cream make-up; blush; eye shadow; lipstick; lip gloss; nail polish; nail polish remover; nail conditioner; bath conditioner; deodorant soap; perfume; eau de toilette; cologne; dusting powder; moisturizer; face lotion; suntan lotion; sunblock lotion; liquid skin toner for face and body | ABANDONED | May 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1997 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |