USPTO serial 74289464
SEE GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEE GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry A. Stulberg
BARRY A STULBERG PRASKE, GROGIN, SAMAHA & STULBERGSTE 1010155 N LAKE AVEPASADENA, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | environmentally safe chemicals and chemical compositions for use in the manufacture of optical lenses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1992 |
| 003 | cleaning preparations for dye removal, all purpose cleaning preparations, skin cleansing creams and lotions, hand cleansing preparations, glass cleaning preparations, toilet cleaning preparations, general purpose scouring creams and lotions, dish detergents, dishwashing detergents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |