USPTO serial 74290143
CAMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 1994
- Examiner
- CHILDRESS, J.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
Schiller Park, IL
Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
Schiller Park, IL
Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
Schiller Park, IL
Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald E. Egan
DONALD E EGAN ATTORNEY AT LAW273 STONEGATE RDCLARENDON HILLS, IL 60514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | metal articles; namely, metal parts made from powdered metal for compressors for machines; machines for cutting; namely, electric powered band saws; machines for crimping, stapling and packaging; electric generators; electric motors for machines; engines (two stroke) for machines; farm equipment; namely, milking machines; lawn mowers; machine parts; namely, gears, sprockets, couplings, motor reducers, and transmission parts; namely, torque converter turbine hubs, clutch hubs, clutch plates, oil pump rotors, oil pump rings, oil pump gears, couplings, output shaft hubs, planetary carrier hubs, parking gears, counter weights, ring gears, chain sprockets, belt sprockets, cams, and oil pump inserts; machine stands; power tools for cutting and drilling; namely, hand drills, screwdrivers, routers, jigsaws, circular saws, and vibratory sanders; pumps; namely, centrifugal and vane-type; sewing machines; machines for loading shotgun shells with shot | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 17, 1948 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CHICAGO POWDERED METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named CAMET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |