Drawing for SLAM DUNK

USPTO serial 74290180

SLAM DUNK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLAM DUNK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terese R. Cohen

TERESE R COHEN NBA PROPERTIES, INCOLYMPIC TWR BLDG645 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prerecorded videotapes in the field of basketballACTIVE—
025clothing; namely, hosiery, footwear, T-shirts, sweat shirts, sweatpants, pants, tank tops, jerseys, shorts, pajamas, sport shirts, rugby shirts, sweaters, belts, nightshirts, hats, warm-up suits, jackets, parkas, coats, cloth bibs, head bands and wrist bandsACTIVE—
028toys and sporting goods, namely, golf balls, playground balls, rubber action balls and foam balls, golf clubs, golf bags, computerized basketball table games, video game cartridges, basketball table top games, basketball board games, dolls, stuffed toys, jigsaw puzzles and Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE—
030confectionary goods; namely, chewing gumACTIVE—
032fruit juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2000EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2000EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 13, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 12, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 20, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 18, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 10, 1998REINREINSTATED—
Jul 20, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 1998DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 26, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 18, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 8, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance