USPTO serial 74291390
P21S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with P21S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan B. Flohr
SUSAN B FLOHR LALOS & KEEGAN1146 NINETEENTH ST N WSTE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3703Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | automobile cleaning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |