USPTO serial 74291824
ANALOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANALOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANALOG HAIR CARE ANALYSIS INC.
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. B. Eisen
M B EISEN RIDOUT & MAYBEE2300 RICHMOND-ADELAIDE CTR101 RICHMOND ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 2J7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal health care products; namely, hair care preparations; namely, shampoos, conditioners, anti-graying preparations, hair growth preparations; hair removal preparations; self-tanning preparations; fingernail strengtheners | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | adult vitamins and energy enhancing supplements | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | personal health care services; namely, consultation and analysis related to personal hygiene | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |