USPTO serial 74292459
POWERSPECTRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERSPECTRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | commercial radio transceivers and receivers; mobile and portable wireless telephone/radio units; commercial switches for wireless and wireline communications equipment, and accessories for wireless communications systems; namely, portable wireless telephone handsets; mobile wireless telephone handsets and cradles; portable terminals using a radio modem; modems for wireless communications; wireless and cordless portable facsimile machines; and desk top computer terminals and telephone and radio equipment which communicate to other devices via radio links | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |