USPTO serial 74293385
DILUTED PERSONAL PROTECTION HEALTH FIRE REACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DILUTED PERSONAL PROTECTION HEALTH FIRE REACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome B. Klose
JEROME B KLOSE MARSHALL, O'TOOLE, GERSTEIN, ET ALTWO FIRST NATIONAL PLZ STE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | liquid alkaline-based cleaning preparation for walls, floors and fixtures; ammoniated liquid all-purpose cleaning preparations; liquid cleaning preparation for washable surfaces particularly for use in the lodging industry; all-purpose liquid cleaning preparation; all-purpose liquid cleaning preparation containing detergent, alkali and solvent for use on soiled fabrics, plastic and metal surfaces and painted surfaces; high strength liquid degreasing and cleaning preparation for removing greasy kitchen soils; liquid tub and tile cleaning preparation; liquid germicidal maintenance cleaning preparation; bulk glass liquid cleaning preparation; liquid window cleaning preparation | ABANDONED | May 11, 1992 |
| 005 | spicy-scented reodorant with a water base to reduce industrial malodor; deodorant/reodorant disinfectant which kills odors and counteracts malodors; liquid detergent cleaner with disinfecting action for washable surfaces; liquid multi-phenolic disinfectant cleaning preparation for hospitals, nursing homes and other institutions; liquid herbal-scented reodorizer which replaces malodors in garbage areas, food processing plants, loading docks and locker rooms; water-based deodorant preparation; liquid deodorizing and sanitizing preparation | ABANDONED | May 11, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |