Drawing for "YOUR ELECTRONIC CLAIMS SPECIALISTS"

USPTO serial 74293748

"YOUR ELECTRONIC CLAIMS SPECIALISTS"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "YOUR ELECTRONIC CLAIMS SPECIALISTS"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Marcus

135 South La Salle Street - Suite 1625Chicago, IL 62025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services in the field of direct pro-cessing of physician's claims to an insurance company; and up-dating of computer software in the field of direct processing of physician's claims to an insurance companyABANDONEDJul 1, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance