USPTO serial 74294098
JOHNSON CONTROLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JOHNSON CONTROLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward L. Levine
EDWARD L LEVINE JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC5757 N GREEN BAY AVEP O BOX 591MILWAUKEE, WI 53201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | vehicle systems products; namely, seats for vehicles and component parts; seat mountings and component parts; armrests, headrests, headliners, and component parts; molded plastic parts for vehicle systems; namely, heating, ventilating, and air conditioning ducts, radiator end tanks, windshield brackets, wiper motor covers, trim panels, fluid reservoirs, one-piece bumpers, side shields and tray backs for seats, and gears and handles for vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |