Drawing for INFANT CARE

USPTO serial 74294216

INFANT CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFANT CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal S. Greenfield

NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-0299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005dietary supplementsABANDONEDAug 18, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 4, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 23, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 5, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance