USPTO serial 74294238
UNFRIED CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 1997
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNFRIED CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hugh D. Finley
HUGH D FINLEY PHILLIPS, MOORE, LEMPIO & FINLEY455 MARKET ST STE 1940SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | rotisserie roasted and broiled chicken | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |