Drawing for THE ELDERHOSTEL INSTITUTE NETWORK

USPTO serial 74294468

THE ELDERHOSTEL INSTITUTE NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFSON, FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ELDERHOSTEL INSTITUTE NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Wolf

DAVID WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039arranging travel toursABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 22, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 3, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance