USPTO serial 74294643
SMARTTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2707307Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2003
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GARLAND, TX
GERMANTOWN, MD
LEXINGTON, MA
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Pittsburgh, PA
GERMANTOWN, MD
GERMANTOWN, MD
DALLAS, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD E MEIER
HAROLD E MEIER BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | commercial transportation and emergency vehicle tracking and information system; namely, computer software for tracking such vehicles and processing GPS position information regarding the location and status of such vehicles; central station monitors for displaying vehicle location information; and communications equipment, namely, transmitters and receivers for relaying vehicle location information between central station dispatchers and vehicle operators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by RAYTHEON COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Westinghouse Electric Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by E-SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTTRACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |