USPTO serial 74295368
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPATHE BAKER BLDG1940 E SIXTH ST SIXTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | sanitary preparations for personal hygiene; namely, feminine catamenial bandages | ABANDONED | Jul 2, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |