USPTO serial 74297241
LSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Boland
THOMAS R BOLAND VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE1828 L ST NW STE 1111WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical apparatus for use in minimally invasive surgical procedures, comprised of an electronic insufflator, electronic auto shutter endoscopic camera system, high intensity xenon light source and related accessories | ABANDONED | Sep 23, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |