USPTO serial 74297353
LAMAZE PARENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 1996
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAMAZE PARENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
Darien, CT
WASHINGTON, DC
LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
Darien, CT
LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
Darien, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. KELLY
David M. Kelly Kelly IP, LLP1919 M Street, NW, Suite 610Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | magazines containing subject matter of interest to expectant parents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAMAZE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAMAZE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LAMAZE PARENTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |