USPTO serial 74297535
FRUIT DEFENDU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLACK, CHERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUIT DEFENDU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Ludwigshafen D-67059, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert C. Ross
HERBERT C ROSS OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLYONE CITICORP CTR153 E 53RD STNEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, toilet water, skin soaps, toilet soaps, deodorant soaps, bath and shower additives; namely, bath and shower gels, bath oils, and non-medicated bath salts, non-medicated sunscreens and suntan lotions, antiperspirants, deodorants for personal use, preparations for body and beauty care; namely, rouge, eyebrow pencils, eye shadow, mascara, lipstick, non-medicated lotions and creams; namely, hand, face body and skin lotions, facial moisturizing masks, face and body powders, facial scrubs, non-medicated hair shampoo and hair care preparations, depilatory agents, shaving creams, shaving foams, aftershave lotions, skin cleaning preparations; namely, clear, creamy and whipped cleansers, toners and fresheners, gels, scrubs and cleansing masks, nail polish and nail polish remover, dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |