Drawing for AIRLUX

USPTO serial 74298068

AIRLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PESKA, KEVIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D. Fields

GARY D FIELDS FIELDS & JOHNSON PC1 NW CTR 1700 LINCOLN ST STE 3030DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, NAMELY, DISH WASHING MACHINES, CLOTHING WASHING MACHINES, ELECTRIC FOOD BLENDERS, ELECTRIC FOOD MIXERS, ELECTRIC FOOD CHOPPERS, ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS AND SMALL ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR PRODUCTS OTHER THAN VACUUM CLEANERS, FLOOR POLISHERS, CARPET SHAMPOOERS AND OTHER FLOOR CARE EQUIPMENTABANDONED—
009ELECTRIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, NAMELY, RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES FOR PRODUCTS OTHER THAN VACUUM CLEANERS, FLOOR POLISHERS, CARPET SHAMPOOERS AND OTHER FLOOR EQUIPMENT, ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES FOR PRODUCTS OTHER THAN VACUUM CLEANERS, FLOOR POLISHERS, CARPET SHAMPOOERS AND OTHER FLOOR CARE EQUIPMENT, BALLASTS AND TRANSFORMERSABANDONED—
011electric household appliances; namely, electric toasters, electric domestic coffee makers, electric rice cookers, electric thermo pots, electric frying pans, electric convection ovens, electric microwave ovens, electric lanterns, electric fans, electric space heaters, refrigerators, air conditioners, humidifiers and dehumidifiers and florescent lightsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 1998EX5MSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Jan 2, 1998EX5DSOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Nov 17, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 1997EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 25, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 10, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 8, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 14, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 17, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 1995OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 24, 1993OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 1993OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 7, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance