USPTO serial 74298422
NATIONAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND DISABILITY CONFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 1993
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATIONAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND DISABILITY CONFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl J. Spagnuolo
Carl J. Spagnuolo McHale & Slavin, P.A.2855 PGA Blvd.Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-2910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | organizing and holding conferences in the field of employee benefits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Axon Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Axon Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LRP PUBLICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NATIONAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND DISABILITY CONFERENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 12, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |