USPTO serial 74298759
TV FAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TV FAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward S. Wright
EDWARD S WRIGHT FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON, ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephone answering machines with built-in fax/modems for displaying fax messages on and playing voice messages through television sets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |