Drawing for ADJUST-A-SHELF

USPTO serial 74299038

ADJUST-A-SHELF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADJUST-A-SHELF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard O. Bartz

RICHARD O BARTZ BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020locker accessories; namely, plastic pre-assembled legless shelf units having generally transverse shelving structures used within lockers as a back-to-school productABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 5, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 5, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 5, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 31, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 2, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Sep 3, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance