USPTO serial 74299048
COUNTRY FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PITTS, AVALYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COUNTRY FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Arlington, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Payton J. Hunt
PAYTON J HUNT SIMON, ANISMAN, DOBY, WILSON & SKILLERN400 PROFESSIONAL BLDG303 W TENTH, P O BOX 17047FT WORTH, TX 76102-7071Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | edible raw processed plants and vegetables, including but not limited to carrots, celery, broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, lettuce, spinach, greens, turnips, radishes and mixed combinations thereof | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |