Drawing for INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES

USPTO serial 74300768

INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Hovey

ROBERT D HOVEY HOVEY, WILLIAMS, TIMMONS & COLLINS1400 MERCANTILE BANK TWR1101 WALNUT STKANSAS CITY, MO 64106

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010dissecting instruments for medical diagnostic purposes; namely, microtomes and microtome blades; and clinical diagnostic test devices for performing immunoassays and readioimmunoassaysABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 21, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 6, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 19, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance