Drawing for STUDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES

USPTO serial 74300865

STUDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick Michael Dwyer

220 W MERCER, STE 500SEATTLE, WA 98119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016books about financial aid, and advertising and promotional literature for the booksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 31, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 22, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1994PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 9, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Sep 7, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance